Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Durham DWI attorney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Durham DWI attorney. Show all posts

Monday, July 2, 2012

Raleigh DWI Defense | Understanding YOUR Case

So, today's Raleigh DWI Attorney Blog focuses on some of the fun questions I get as one of the Raleigh DWI Defense Lawyers in the area. As a practicing attorney, it is common place for people to approach you and ask for my thoughts on their case (or their friend's case, cousin's case, etc.). I also enjoy the hypothetical that comes with the position as well (what if......). Hypothetical questions are always fun because the person asking is usually looking for a professional view on a fictitious scenario and therefore has less at stake. However, for those that approach me about their Raleigh Criminal Charges, Raleigh DWI Charge or Wake County Traffic Ticket, they are very concerned about the outcome and therefore want me to give the best case options they have available to them. Normally, when speaking with the individuals, I have no problem sharing with them my opinion on how the case would be handled and what outcome I believe they could expect. What can become frustrating very quickly is when they questionor starts sharing with me what they have heard from friends and family. All-to-often, their cousin's friend's girlfriend had this exact charge dismissed. Or their Aunt in Wyoming faced something similar and the she got a slap on the wrist. It can be very difficult explaining to someone how those cases can be (or more often then not, are entirely) different from their current case. See, the reality of traffic, DWI, and Criminal Defense is there are so many variables that play into the outcome that any one individual's outcome can be entirely different from the next, even if they are in the same county. It's like asking why your surgery recovery time was different then someone 20 years younger then you who had the same surgery (or worse, had a different surgery). Being an Attorney, like most any other professional, requires an refined understanding of many minute variables which can impact the outcome of any one endeavour. For the practice of law, some of the more obvious are the State and county in which the charges were brought, the laws governing them, the prior criminal record of the Defendant, the District Attorney handling the case and the Judge if there is a trial. What a lot of people don't realize is there are many, many more factors that play into any one case. Who brought the charges, where there problems with the evidence, where there problems with the stop, what about any searches, any witnesses, are the witnesses for the State competent, are the present, etc.? As example, I provide free consultations for people calling about their Raleigh DWI charges, or any other North Carolina Criminal Charges or traffic tickets they received in the Research Triangle Area. The most popular by far are the North Carolina DUI/DWI Charge calls. Whenever I provide the potential client a case evaluation, I always tell them that I am making my best educated guess based on the facts as they have conveyed them to me. However, I won't know anything for sure until I have had an opportunity to speak with the Police Officer and take a look at their notes. I do this because, what the Defendant may remember about that night can be different then what the Officer remembers, and the Officer's Testimony is usually the one I have to work with (because putting a Raleigh DWI Defendant on the stand will lead to cross-examination about them drinking and driving and that hurts our case). In addition to someone else's experience with the same or similar charges, the other part of this is that of what other family or friends are telling the individual how the case should be handled. I always enjoy hearing what people with no prior legal experience are telling these individuals about the lawfulness of the Police Officer's conduct or how the case should proceed to lead to an out-right dismissal of charges. The reality is, you speak with an attorney about your case because they have an extensive education and (hopefully) experience in this area and can properly advice you about your individual case. So, this blog is dedicated to those who want legal advice but are letting what other people tell them influence their expectations. If you are facing charges in North Carolina, or anywhere else for that matter, speak with a local attorney about your case. If you have received charges in the Research Triangle Area, contact the Matheson Law Office today at 919-335-5291 for a free consultation.

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

North Carolina DWI Law | Finding the Right Lawyer

So, today in the world of this Raleigh DWI Attorney I witnessed something that had my interest. I watched as an attorney plead out a dwi charge for their client who had a prior DWI charge. Now, fortunately, for this North Carolina DUI Charge, the Defendant's Prior NC DUI Conviction was more then 7 years ago and therefore was not a Grossly Aggravating Factor, only an Aggravating Factor (side note: I find it silly that the legislation couldn't come up with different names for these two things so they aren't so close that they cause confusion to many clients as I try to explain the difference between them). However, this Defendant's license was revoked at the time of the current NC DWI and therefore had at least one Grossly Aggravating Factor. Now, aside from the fact that I thought the Defense Attorney could have argued better for sentencing, it wasn't what I found so interesting about this plea deal. What was interesting about this case was the fact that the Defendant was reported to the Police by an anonymous tip AND that the Defendant had refused to provide a breath sample to the Police Officer when they caught up with her. Now, let me preface what I am about to say, I do not know all the facts about this case. There may have been a very good reason to plea this case out; the Police Officer may have gotten reasonable suspicion before he stopped her, they may have drew blood, they may have other evidence that I am not privy to, or the Defendant may have just wanted to plea the case out and get it over with (almost had a client facing similar sentencing do this exact thing). But, given that the Defendant was facing a minimum jail sentence (they were actually sentenced above the minimum to 120 days active jail sentence) I find it difficult to understand why a trial was not had? First, for anonymous tips, there's extra steps the State must go through in order to justify the stop based on it, and even then there are certain challenges that can be made to try and prevent the testimony of what the tip was, which could prevent the State from entering any evidence as a result of the tip and possibly beating the case. Additionally, a case where the Defendant has refused to below is a very triable case. Understand, 'very triable' and 'very winnable' are two completely different things. But, at least with a refusal, the State has to either: 1. prove appreciable impairment, which is a subjective concept that a Raleigh Defense Attorney could cast doubt on or 2. it's a blood draw, in which case the Defense attorney could try and keep it out unless the State presents evidence of chain of custody as well as the presence of the person who drew the blood. Again, I say, I do not know all of the facts of the case, so I am not trying to be too critical of this particular case. But I am extremely curious as to why this was plead out and not tried. In my talks with other attorneys (given, only a handful when considering the large volume of attorneys doing Raleigh DWI Defense and Durham DWI Defense) it seems that many attorneys are quick to plea and avoid trial because they don't feel that there's much chance of winning. And while that is true (they can be hard to beat) there is little to no consequence to the Defendant if they decide on a trial and it is their only chance of beating the NC Driving While Intoxicated charge. I guess what I am trying to say is, when speaking with the Attorney you may potentially hire in this case, be sure you inquire as to whether they are prepared to try the case or are they just interested in a quick turn-around where they just plea out the case. Disclaimer - Information and advice offered in this article is for informational and educational purposes only and is specific to North Carolina law. The viewing, receipt and/or exchange of information from this article does not constitute an Attorney-Client Relationship. For assistance regarding your particular legal question speak with an Attorney practicing in the field from which your questions derives.

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Dangerous Conduct in the DUI News World

Though this didn't take place in North Carolina, and therefore does not involve a North Carolina DWI Charge, I find the following article 'blog-worthy.' The following article: DWI/DUI involves grandparents in Florida who decided, after knocking back a few, to tow their 7 year old behind their SUV, up and down an access road, in a hot wheels. The Driver was the young child's grandfather, and though the article did not mention what his blood/alcohol concentration was, it did indicate that this was his FOURTH DWI CHARGE! I have had clients before who have had previous been charged with North Carolina Driving While Intoxicated and it was not their first charge, but I have yet to have someone on their Fourth North Carolina DUI Charge. The grandmother in this case was seated in the cargo area of the vehicle with the hatch up, cheering on her young granddaughter as she was pulled behind the vehicle in a toy car. The grandmother was also impaired during this event (ideally, one would hope a sober person would not think a drunk driver pulling a child in a toy car behind a real car up and down the road was a good idea). The article mentions that the grandfather has been charged with Driving under the Influence, driving with a suspended license (similar to North Carolina Driving While License Revoked) and cruelty to a child. The Grandmother also faces cruelty to a child charge. From a Raleigh DWI Lawyers standpoint, I obviously do not condone this conduct. Driving While Impaired North Carolina is a serious charge and can be risky to yourself and those with you and/or around you. That being said, the DWI laws in North Carolina have become so strict that individuals who arguably were driving without signs of impairment (certainly less then those that insist on texting while driving or putting on make up as they drive) are catching serious charges with serious sentences. However, in this instance, I'm certain the grandfather will face very serious consequences for his actions. Not being familiar with Florida law, I can't say for sure, but certainly here in North Carolina he would be facing a jail sentence. It is never advisable to Driving Under the Influence North Carolina, but if you do, contact a local DWI attorney to best advice you on how to proceed. Disclaimer - Information and advice offered in this article is for informational and educational purposes only and is specific to North Carolina law. The viewing, receipt and/or exchange of information from this article does not constitute an Attorney-Client Relationship. For assistance regarding your particular legal question speak with an Attorney practicing in the field from which your questions derives.

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Raleigh DWI Trial | Why Not Go To Trial?

Recently, I was having lunch with another North Carolina DWI Attorney. Included in this Attorney's practice is Raleigh/Durham DWI Defense. I was explaining to him a case I had coming up the following day. As we went over the facts, I explained to him that I intended to call this matter for trial. He reiterated to me the facts of the case I had just explained and asked me what there was to have a trial on. I explained to him my strategy for trial and that was the end of the conversation. As it turned out, neither of us were proven correct as I didn't get to trial. Rather, the Prosecutor was forced to dismiss my client's North Carolina DWI Charge due to the fact that the Police Officer was in training the day of trial and would not be able to make it. Now, when this normally happens, the State would just ask for a continuance, the Judge would grant it, and the State would get another opportunity to get their Police Officer in for this Durham DWI Trial. In this particular case, I had already called it for trial before and at that time, the Officer wasn't available, so the State was forced to continue it, and the Judge explained that it would not be continued again. Fast-Forward to the new court date, Officer isn't available, and the Judge denied State's motion. Though the State has the option of re-charging my client (which I find totally unconstitutional, but unfortunately, presently acceptable due to case law) my client and me are hoping that this will be the end of the ordeal. I write about this today because it struck me as odd that my friend would think it shouldn't be tried. First, I felt that my arguments I planned to make in my Pre-trial motions to suppress had a decent change of being persuasive, in which case, had the Judge granted my Motion to Suppress, the case would have had to been dismissed or the motion appealed (the latter being the more common practice in this particular county). But, more importantly, I feel like most DWI charges should be taken to trial. I believe there are many reasons for this, but most importantly is, the trial is the unknown; you never know what will happen. You may have a good idea as to what will happen, but can't be sure. But, you may ask, what about pleading them out instead of trial? Well, funny you should (rhetorically) ask. In the counties that I practice (Wake, Durham and Harnett) as I assume in all other North Carolina Counties, the Prosecutor will not plead out a North Carolina DWI Charge to something other then a DWI charge. They will almost always dismiss the other associated charges (like if they originally pulled you for speeding) but not the DWI. So, a Defendant's only hope of avoiding the DWI charge is trial. In my conversations with other Raleigh DWI Attorneys, I am starting to get the impression that my theory is more in the minority then the majority. If true, I find this very upsetting. I charge a middle-of-the-road rate for representing someone facing a North Carolina DWI Charge. My fee is, what I believe to be, a fair representation of the time and effort I put into a case (well, technically, I think I should earn more, but the market being what it is, I do have to be competitive). Every client I get who is facing a North Carolina DWI Charge I spend a good amount of time investigating their case in order to determine whether their are any try-able facts. Even if there is nothing to hang a Defense on, my recommendation is almost always trial, just to see what happens. The North Carolina DWI Sentence the DWI Defendant faces is the same whether they plead guilty or are found guilty. So, unless there are other charges which could be dismissed that the Defendant wants to avoid, the best bet is almost always trial. Which brings me back to my conversation with the other Durham DWI Lawyer. Granted, my client had indication of impairment at the time of the arrest (though not enough, in my assessment) and he blew above the limit. For all intents and purposes, my client was likely guilty of Driving While Impaired. However, I felt there were problems with the stop and the arrest (see my blog post about defending these types of Constitutional issues and why it is important) and decided to have a trial. For my efforts, my client has avoided a DWI conviction (though not without punishment, when you consider multiple trips to court - time and money, my cost, losing his driving privilege for 30 days, $100 for the implied consent offense fee, and he completed a Substance Abuse Assessment in anticipation of a conviction). I guess my point is, this is an instance where due diligence and an eye on trial paid off for my client and should be the practice of all Raleigh DWI Attorneys.

Friday, November 4, 2011

North Carolina DWI: The Role of the Assistant District Attorney

Today's Raleigh DWI Attorney blog is going to deal with the roll of the Assistant District Attorneys in the prosecution of Criminal Defendants.  Though today's Raleigh DWI Attorney blog deals in the area of Driving While Intoxicated, this blog applies to all criminal prosecution; including traffic. 

First, don't think this blog will be used to bash those who are Assistant District Attorneys.  Though I am currently a DWI Lawyer Raleigh and DWI Lawyer Durham, I was actually sworn in as an Assistant District Attorney before and prosecuted cases for the State of North Carolina.  Many fine attorneys have before, and are currently, quality Prosecutors.  I can tell you from experience, the job is hard, tedious, and often thankless.  No, today's blog will be used to advice you as to the roll they play in the prosecution of your case (hint: it's not normally to assist you).

First, a brief explanation of the U.S. Justice System as it applies to courts.  Our trials are what are known as "adversarial proceedings."  Basically, both sides do their best for the side they represent, and through that effort, the truth is suppose to come out.  Basically, the Assistant District Attorney does their best to represent the State by prosecuting criminal defendants to the best of their ability.  Defendant, either by themselves or with the assistance of counsel, present their best defense.  Many people have discussed the flaws inherent in our system, unfortunately this is the system we have to work within.

So, the Assistant District Attorneys are there to prosecute your case.  If you are your attorney's client, then the Assistant District Attorney's client would be the State.  So, when an Assistant District Attorney is dealing with the facts, as well as dealing with Defendants, their main goal is to serve the needs of the State by prosecuting those cases.  For that reason, the Assistant District Attorney IS NOT normally working in your best interest.  Now, as a caveat, I will acknowledge that certainly there are those Prosecutors who recognize a mistake by the State, and will work to overcome it.  If the evidence is poor, the arrest is flawed, or the case is meritless, the Assistant District Attorney should do what is right and dismiss the case.  Unfortunately, though the Prosecutor may do the right thing, you cannot count on it when it comes to the defense of your case. 

First, the Defendant should never acknowledge anything to the Assistant District Attorney with regards to the facts of the case.  Again, they are working for the State, so admitting anything can AND WILL come up in trial or at least in their decision in how to handle your case. 

Second, the Assistant District Attorney CAN NOT and WILL NOT provide you with legal advice, so don't ask.  In fact, it would violate Ethical Rules of the North Carolina Bar if they were to advice you.  As mentioned before, they represent the State, they are the adverse party, they cannot advice you as to how to handle your case, whether to accept a plea, or what could happen if you go to trial.  I can recount many-a-times when I was a Prosecutor, where I knew what the Defendant should do, but couldn't tell them.  This is why it is ALWAYS a good idea to speak with a Cary Criminal Attorney, Apex Criminal Attorney, Raleigh Criminal Attorney or Durham Criminal Attorney about your case.  If you are considering representing yourself, consider the fact that most attorney's fees are reasonable when compared to the potential consequences that a Defendant could face.  Though no outcome should ever be guaranteed by a Criminal Defense Attorney, it's always a good idea to hedge your bets. 

Monday, October 31, 2011

North Carolina Limited Driving Privileges| What is Needed for the Petition

In today's DWI Blog, I will be focusing on North Carolina's Limited Driving Privilege.  Though a Limited Driving Privilege applies to more situation then a DWI, today's blog will only focus on it's function in the DWI world.

First, the Petition is just that, a petition.  The Privilege must be agreed to by a District Court Judge, there are no guarantees that you will be given a privilege.  Second, the Privilege is normally only for Monday through Friday, 6:00 A.M. until 8:00 P.M.  If you need to drive outside of those time for school or work, it can be requested with additional documentation.

There are two areas of a DWI case where the Limited Driving Privilege applies, first is after being charged with a DWI, you will have your license suspended for 30 days.  Most likely, the Police Officer took your license.  In those situations the Privilege can not be granted for the first 10 days, therefore if granted, the Privilege will only be for the remaining 20 days.  If convicted of a DWI or if you plead guilty to a DWI, you will have your license suspended for 12 months.  Depending on how high your blood/alcohol level was at the time of your arrest will dictate when you can petition the court for a Limited Driving Privilege for those 12 months.  The petition requires several things before a Judge will consider it.  Below, I have listed those things that are necessary.

1. A certified 7-year driving record from the DMV
2. A Limited Driving Privilege Petition (Form AOC-CVR-9)
3. Fully completed Limited Driving Privileges (Form AOC-CVR-10 or AOC-CVR-11) (3 copies of each)
4. Valid proof of driving insurance (called a 'DL-123 form')
5. Proof of Substance Abuse Assessment
6. Letter from an employer or school if requesting more time outside of the standard hours.
7. $100 cost for the privilege.

This process can seem a bit complicated, but it can be done.  If you feel overwhelmed, speak with a local Durham DWI Attorney or Raleigh DWI Attorney or a DWI Attorney in your area for assistance.  Some may be willing to assist you without handling your DWI case.

Friday, September 2, 2011

Raleigh DWI Attorney Blog | Intros

So, in posting my first blog post, I jumped the gun and learned that an introductory blog is normally appropriate.  I am an attorney in North Carolina who handles Raleigh Criminal Defense and Durham Criminal Defense.  In addition to Criminal Defense, I also am a Raleigh Traffic Attorney, with a special focus on handling Raleigh DWI charges and Durham DWI charges.  Since this is a focus of my practice, I thought it practical the title of the blog be Raleigh DWI attorney blog, even though my area of practice is slightly more broad. 
This blog is to serve as a way to keep my clients, as well as potential clients and the general public on the happenings in the world of DWI; specifically North Carolina DWI information.  Hopefully, if you are reading this, you will find the information that will follow as useful.
Beyond my practice, I have several interests that I try to maintain.  First and foremost is my family, I am married with no children (yet).  We have two wonderful pups we rescued, Mungo and Molly; both mutts.  I enjoy automotive restoration and fabrication, almost any outdoor activities, and when time permits, cheering on my Carolina Hurricanes.  Recently, I have even taken up Adult amateur ice hockey, which I am really enjoying.
That is all for now, please subscribe, or just check back often as I intend to keep this blog updated constantly.

Cheers!